Federal · U.S. House
Greg Casar
U.S. Representative · TX-35 · Party: Democratic
510 final-passage votes on record.
Record at a glance
Counts of recorded votes only. ThePillory doesn't score or grade officials.
Office
- Office
- U.S. Representative
- District
- TX-35
- Party
- Democratic
- Term
- Since 2023
- Website
- Official site ↗
Source
No platform recorded yet
This tab shows Greg Casar's platform in two parts. In their own words: a short excerpt, word for word, from their own Issues or Priorities page, with a link to the whole page, and statements their office submits, labeled as such. Commitments tracked: specific, checkable promises (signing a named bill, funding a program at a stated amount, finishing a project by a date), each quoted with its date and source and checked in code before it's published, with a status that changes only with evidence.
How the platform is recordedShowing every recorded vote. Procedural, amendment, committee, and nomination votes are labeled.
-
Yes Source ↗
-
H.R. 2872
To amend the Permanent Electronic Duck Stamp Act of 2013 to allow the Secretary of the Interior to issue electronic stamps under such Act, and for other purposes
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Concur in the Senate Amendment
Yes Source ↗ -
S. 3250
To provide remote access to court proceedings for victims of the 1988 Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Yes Source ↗ -
H.Res. 957
Denouncing the Biden administration’s open-borders policies, condemning the national security and public safety crisis along the southwest border, and urging President Biden to end his administration’s open-borders policies
On Agreeing to the Resolution
No Source ↗ -
H.R. 5862
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 relating to authority of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to consolidate, modify, or reorganize Customs revenue functions
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Yes Source ↗ -
H.Res. 969
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6914) Pregnant Students’ Rights Act; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6918) Supporting Pregnant and Parenting Women and Families Act; providing for consideration of the resolution (H.Res. 957)
On Agreeing to the Resolution
No Source ↗ -
Yes Source ↗
-
H.J.Res. 98
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to “Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status”
On Passage
No Source ↗ -
S.J.Res. 38
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration relating to “Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers”
On Passage
No Source ↗ -
No Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
H.Res. 947
Providing for consideration of (H.R. 788) Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act; (H.J. Res. 98) congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status; (S.J. Res. 38) congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers
On Agreeing to the Resolution
No Source ↗ -
H.Res. 947
Providing for consideration of (H.R. 788) Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act; (H.J. Res. 98) congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status; (S.J. Res. 38) congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers
On Motion to Reconsider
No Source ↗ -
H.Res. 947
Providing for consideration of (H.R. 788) Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act; (H.J. Res. 98) congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status; (S.J. Res. 38) congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers
On Agreeing to the Resolution
No Source ↗ -
H.Res. 947
Providing for consideration of (H.R. 788) Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act; (H.J. Res. 98) congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status; (S.J. Res. 38) congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Waiver of Buy America Requirements for Electric Vehicle Chargers
On Ordering the Previous Question
No Source ↗ -
QUORUM
Call of the House
Not voting Source ↗ -
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
No Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
No Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
-
Yes Source ↗
Raised · 2025–2026
$1,172,881
Spent $946,714 · Cash on hand $597,005 as of Jun 30, 2026
Money raised by Greg Casar's campaign committees in 2025–2026, through Jun 30, 2026 (latest report: july quarterly 2026), as reported to the Federal Election Commission. These are facts about money, shown beside the voting record; they don't explain any vote.
Where it came from
- Small individual donors ($200 or less)$266,99223%
- Larger individual donors (more than $200)$621,99853%
- PACs and other political committees$251,22021%
- Political party committees$00%
- The candidate (own money and loans)$00%
- Other (transfers, refunds, interest)$32,6703%
For comparison, the average of the 426 House members with 2025–2026 filings loaded: raised $2,381,001; PACs 36% of money raised; small donors 10%; cash on hand $1,617,763.
Top PACs
- MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS$10,000
- SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)$10,000
- AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES - P.E.O.P.L.E., NATIONAL$10,000
- NATIONAL ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS PAC/ INTN'L UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS (NEC PAC)$7,500
- AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC$6,000
- CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS$5,000
- COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA - COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEE$5,000
- UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION ACTIVE BALLOT CLUB$5,000
- UAW - V - CAP (UAW VOLUNTARY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM) 'INT'L UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAW$5,000
- UNITE HERE TIP CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$5,000
The 10 largest of $251,220 from PACs and other political committees (21% of all money raised). Every PAC contribution at the FEC ↗
Outside spending for and against
- THE PEOPLE UNITED PAC$38
None reported.
Independent expenditures: spending on ads and outreach about this member, without coordinating with the campaign. This money isn't given to the campaign. FEC record ↗
Top contributing industries (approximate)
- Labor unions$132,780
- Lawyers and lobbyists$37,165
- Issue and advocacy groups$33,100
- Education$23,390
- Finance, insurance and banking$21,300
- Other members' leadership PACs and campaigns$18,000
- Health care$15,982
- Government and public sector$12,073
Approximate. Industries are assigned by keywords in PAC and employer names (how); 54% of these dollars matched an industry, and the rest are left unclassified rather than guessed. Employer amounts count only donors who gave more than $200, from the campaign's principal committee.
Donors' employers
- CITY OF AUSTIN$7,900
- HEISING-SIMONS FOUNDATION$7,250
- HILLCO PARTNERS$6,800
- COMPASS$4,000
- FULCRUM PUBLIC AFFAIRS$4,000
- UT AUSTIN$3,595
- STATE OF TEXAS$2,635
- ERIC WINTERS GOFF LLC$2,535
- HMWK LLC$2,515
- ATLAS CAPGLO$2,500
Employers named by donors who gave more than $200, summed; an employer is listed only when 3 or more people named it. Individual donors are never listed.
Source: Federal Election Commission (Greg Casar at the FEC ↗), 2025–2026. Read Oct 9, 2026. Federal law bars using contributor information from FEC reports to ask for contributions or for commercial purposes; ThePillory shows totals only and has no donor export. Methodology
Issues
No reports yet. Reporting opens when accounts launch.
How it works