Federal · H.R. 3089 · 118th Congress
NDO Fairness Act
This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders. Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services (providers) to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers.
First two sentences of the Congressional Research Service's summary · Congress.gov ↗
This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders.
Passed the House on May 15, 2023. Waiting on the Senate.
Find your representatives to see how yours voted.
First two sentences of the Congressional Research Service's summary · Congress.gov ↗. A plain-words version comes later. Official page ↗
Your reps
Find your representatives to see how yours voted.
Latest final vote: Passed · U.S. House · May 15, 2023
Official record ↗Constitution
Not yet mapped. The parts of the Constitution this bill touches appear here once an analysis is written and checked.
Want an analysis of this bill? A full analysis maps every provision it touches.
All votes
U.S. House · May 15, 2023 · Final passage
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass · Passed
Official record ↗By party
| Party | Yes | No | Present | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 178 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 165 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By state (48)
| State | Yes | No | Present | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| AR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AZ | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CA | 50 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| CO | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CT | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DE | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FL | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GA | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| HI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IA | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ID | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| IL | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| IN | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| KS | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KY | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| LA | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MA | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MD | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ME | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MI | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MN | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MO | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MS | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MT | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NC | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| NE | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NH | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NJ | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NM | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NV | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NY | 18 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| OH | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OK | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| OR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PA | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| RI | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TN | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TX | 31 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| UT | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VA | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VT | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| WA | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| WI | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| WV | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| WY | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The breakdown counts the 370 members whose positions are loaded; the totals above are the official record's.
Party is as each member's record lists it. Counts are of recorded positions, nothing more.
Every member's vote
370 members, by last name.
From the official record of each vote. A member who left office keeps their recorded position; their page shows the years they served.
Money
Lobbying reports for this bill haven't been searched yet. They're searched for every bill with a final-passage vote.
History
- May 15, 2023U.S. House: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass · Passed ↗
Recorded votes on this bill and the final action, as their sources record them. Committee and other steps without a recorded vote aren't listed; the official page has every action.
Final action
Not checked yet. The President's action on a bill appears here after the data sync looks it up.
From Congress.gov's record of the bill's actions.
Full text
Official summary (Congressional Research Service)
NDO Fairness Act This bill makes various changes to the procedures and requirements with respect to delayed notification orders. Current law authorizes the government to compel providers of electronic communication services or remote computing services (providers) to disclose certain records and information pertaining to subscribers and customers. Further, a provider may notify subscribers or customers of the government's request for records and information unless the government obtains a delayed notification order. With respect to delayed notification orders, the bill raises the standard for courts to grant a delayed notification order, requires courts to issue delayed notification orders only after issuing a written determination based on specific facts, and requires orders to be narrowly tailored. Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to delayed notification orders, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; the number of applications for orders; the number of orders granted, extended, or denied; and the number of orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.
Source ↗